|
Sovereign Grace Missionary Baptist Church September 12, 2004 Bro. Randy Johnson, Pastor Ronnie Henderson, Song Director Pastor E-Mail: sgmbcpastor@countrybaptist.org Web Site: www.countrybaptist.org/sgmbc |
| Please Pray For:
Ronnie & Sarah Henderson, Sister Wall, Wendell & Hazel Henderson, Joe Henderson, Eddie & Lorain Murray, Larry & Linda Mollette, Donna Johnson, James Sherwood, Jim & Linda Meier, Mrs. Worsham, Leroy Sherwood & Family, Virgil Hoskins, Vinson Hoskins, Bro. & Mrs. Harace Hammond, Rosa Graves, Linda {Someone Bryan work’s with}, Della Oats, Tyron Evens, Shawn Bradford & Family, Brenda Tubbs, Justin & Holly Bookout, Mr. Loony, Gina & Bryan Thompson, Danny Hammond, Bobby Thompson and Family, Eld. Davis, Raymond Hammond, Jean Hoskins, Fay Johnson, And All of Our Military, Their Family’s & All the Civilian Workers in The Middle East. |
| A Thought For The Week: THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD IN CREATION "Thou art worthy, 0 Lord, to receive glory, and honor, and power: for Thou hast created all things and for Thy pleasure they are and were created." (Rev. 4:11)Sovereignty characterizes the whole Being of God: let us observe how
it marks all His ways and dealings. In the great expanse of eternity, which stretches behind Genesis 1:1,
the universe was unborn and creation existed only in the mind of the
great Creator. In His sovereign majesty, God dwelt all alone. We refer
to that far distant period before the heavens and the earth were
created. There were then no angels to hymn God's praises, no creatures
to occupy His notice, no rebels to be brought to subjection. The great
God was all alone amid the awful silence of His own vast universe. But
even at that time, if time it could be called, God was sovereign. He
might create or not create according to His own good pleasure. He
might create this way or that way; He might create one world or one
million worlds, and who was there to resist His will? He might call into
existence a million different creatures and place them on absolute
equality, endowing them with the same faculties and placing them in
the same environment; or, He might create a million creatures each
differing from the others, and possessing nothing in common save
their creaturehood, and who was there to challenge His right? If He so
pleased, He might call into existence a world so immense that its
dimensions were utterly beyond finite computation; and were He so
disposed, He might create an organism so small that nothing but the most
powerful microscope could reveal its existence to human eyes. It was His
sovereign right to create, on the one hand, the exalted seraphim to burn
around his throne, and on the other hand, the tiny insect which dies the
same hour that it is born. If the mighty God chose to have one vast
gradation in His universe, from loftiest seraph to creeping reptile,
from revolving worlds to floating atoms, from macrocosm to microcosm,
instead of making everything uniform, who was there to question His
sovereign pleasure? BEHOLD THEN THE EXERCISE OF DIVINE SOVEREIGNTY LONG BEFORE MAN EVER
SAW THE LIGHT. With whom took God counsel in the creation and disposition of His
creatures? See the birds as they fly through the air, the beasts as they
roam the earth, the fishes as they swim in the sea, and then ask, Who
was it that made them to differ? Was it not their Creator who
sovereignly assigned their various locations and adaptations to
them?! TURN YOUR EYE TO THE HEAVENS and observe the mysteries of divine
sovereignty which there confront the thoughtful beholder: "There is one
glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of
the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory" (1
Cor. 15:41). But why should they? Why should the sun be more glorious
than all the other planets? Why should there be stars of the first
magnitude and others of the tenth? Why such amazing inequalities?
Why should some of the heavenly bodies be more favorably placed than
others in their relation to the sun? And why should there be "shooting
stars", "falling stars", "wandering stars" (Jude 13), in a word,
ruined stars? And the only possible answer is, "For Thy pleasure
they are and were created" (Rev. 4:11) COME NOW TO OUR OWN PLANET Why should two thirds of its surface
be covered with water, and why should so much of its remaining third be
unfit for human cultivation or habitation? Why should there be vast
stretches of marshes, deserts and icefields? Why should one country be
so inferior, topographically, from another? Why should one be fertile,
and another almost barren? Why should one be rich in minerals and
another own none? Why should the climate of one be congenial and
healthy, and another uncongenial and unhealthy? Why should one abound in
rivers and lakes, and another be almost devoid of them? Why should one
be constantly troubled with earthquakes, and another be almost entirely
free from them? WHY? LOOK AT THE ANIMAL KINGDOM and note the wondrous variety. What
comparison is possible between the lion and the lamb, the bear and the
kid, the elephant and the mouse? Some, like the horse and the dog, are
gifted with great intelligence; while others, like sheep and swine, are
almost devoid of it. Why? Some are designed to be beasts of
burden, while others enjoy a life of freedom. But why should the mule
and the donkey be shackled to a life of drudgery, while the lion and
tiger are allowed to roam the jungle at their pleasure? Some are fit for
food, others unfit; some are beautiful, others ugly; some are endowed
with great strength, others are quite helpless; some are fleet of foot,
others can scarcely crawl-contrast the hare and the tortoise; some are
of use to man, others appear to be quite valueless; some live for
centuries, others a few months at most; some are tame, others fierce.
But why all these variations and differences? What is true of the animals is equally true of the birds and fishes.
But CONSIDER NOW THE VEGETABLE KINGDOM. Why should roses have
thorns, and lilies grow without them? Why should one flower emit a
fragrant aroma and another have none? Why should one tree bear fruit
which is wholesome and another that which is poisonous? Why should one
vegetable be capable of enduring frost and another wither under it? Why
should one apple tree be loaded with fruit, and another tree of the same
age and in the same orchard be almost barren? Why should one plant
flower a dozen times a year and another bear blossoms but once a
century? Truly, "whatsoever the Lord pleased, that did He in heaven,
and in the earth, in the seas, and all deep places" (Psa. 135:6).
CONSIDER THE ANGELIC HOSTS. If then we see the sovereignty of God displayed throughout all
creation, why should it be thought a strange thing IF WE BEHOLD IT
OPERATING IN THE MIDST OF THE HUMAN FAMILY? Why should it be thought
strange if to one God is pleased to give five talents and another only
one? Why should it be thought strange if one is born with a robust
constitution and another of the same parents is frail and sickly? Why
should it be thought strange if Abel is cut off in his prime, while Cain
is suffered to live on for many years? Why should it be thought strange
that some should be born black and others white; that some be born
idiots and others with high intellectual endowments; some be born
constitutionally lethargic and others full of energy; some be born with
a temperament that is selfish, fiery, egotistical, and others who are
naturally self-sacrificing, submissive and meek? Why should it be
thought strange if some are qualified by nature to lead and rule, while
others are only fitted to follow and serve? Heredity and environment
cannot account for all these variations and inequalities. No; it is
GOD who maketh one to differ from another. Why should He? "Even so,
Father, for so it seemed good in Thy sight" must be our reply. Learn then this basic truth, that THE CREATOR IS ABSOLUTELY
SOVEREIGN, EXECUTING HIS OWN WILL, PERFORMING HIS OWN PLEASURES, AND
CONSIDERING NOUGHT BUT HIS OWN GLORY "The Lord hath made all things
FOR HIMSELF" (Prov. 16:4). And had He not a perfect right to?
Since God IS God, who dare challenge His prerogative? To murmur against
Him is rank rebellion. To question His ways is to impugn His wisdom. To
criticise Him is sin of the deepest dye. Have we forgotten WHO He is?
Behold, All nations before Him are as nothing; and they are counted
to Him less than nothing, and vanity. To whom then will ye liken God?
(Isa. 40; 17,18) By: A.W. Pink |
| News For The Week: ...A September 8 report in the New York Times notes that some members of the Islamic community are starting to respond to worldwide Muslim terrorist violence with internal self-criticism. The recent tragic school siege in Russia, which left hundreds of adults and children dead or wounded, has touched off a medley of self-recrimination and introspection in the Muslim and Arab world. Abdel Rahman al-Rashed, the general manager of the widely watched satellite television station Al Arabiya, was quoted as saying that, while it is true that not all Muslims are terrorists, "it is equally certain, and exceptionally painful, that almost all terrorists are Muslims." In a commentary published in the pan-Arab newspaper Al Sharq al Awsat, Rashed took note of the "shameful and degrading" record of violence perpetrated by Islamic terrorists around the world and remarked, "What an abominable 'achievement.' Does this tell us anything about ourselves, our societies and our culture?" The Muslim media executive joined other commentators in singling out for blame Muslim clerics like Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, whose incendiary broadcasts on Al Jazeera television have called for the killing of Americans and other foreign "occupiers" in Iraq, whether military or civilian. Rashed wonders how someone like the sheik can be believed when he calls Islam a religion of mercy and peace while he himself is "turning it into a religion of blood and slaughter." [Jenni Parker] Source: Agape News press |
| Psa 45:11 "So shall the king greatly desire thy beauty: for he [is] thy Lord; and worship thou him." |